The Struggle of American Conservatives
Feb. 27th, 2009 10:03 pmClassic conservative principles are timeless; immutable tenets that have inspired great changes in government over the last 400 years and spoken passionately and plainly to the needs and hopes of ordinary people. Since the end of World War II, those classical principles have informed a devastating critique of the welfare state, presenting a reasoned and logical alternative to statism and dependency. Conservatism has stood for human liberty based on the fundamental idea of natural law; that from his first breath, man is born free.
But conservatism has gone off the rails, becoming in some respects a parody of itself. A philosophy that is all about honoring and conserving tradition while allowing for change that buttresses and supports important aspects of the past, has been hijacked by ideologues who brook no deviation from a dogma that limits rather than expands human freedom. Conservatism has become loud, obnoxious, closed-minded, and puerile, while its classical tradition of tolerance and hard-headed rationalism has been abandoned in favor of emotional jags and a vicious parochialism that eschews debate for “litmus tests” on ideological purity.
...
Until conservatives can practice some painful introspection, looking with a self-critical eye at the reasons for the debacles of 2006 and 2008, most in the movement will continue to delude themselves that simply reaffirming conservative love of small government, low taxes, and less regulation will be enough to convince a majority of Americans that they recognize their shortcomings and have changed their tune. There must be a reckoning with those who violate the very nature of conservatism by obstinately adhering to exclusionary, anti-intellectual precepts that have thrown classical conservatism over in favor of ranting, ideological tantrums.
-- Rich Moran for PajamasMedia.com
When Rush Limbaugh is considered to be your movement's leader and foremost voice, you know you're in trouble, and it's only healthy that you should be in trouble, as it shows that our country still has some good instincts.
Then there is the issue of hypocrisy. New Scientist has a study that draws a correlation between those states that more strongly profess religiously conservative values and those that consume more online pornography. One example:
But conservatism has gone off the rails, becoming in some respects a parody of itself. A philosophy that is all about honoring and conserving tradition while allowing for change that buttresses and supports important aspects of the past, has been hijacked by ideologues who brook no deviation from a dogma that limits rather than expands human freedom. Conservatism has become loud, obnoxious, closed-minded, and puerile, while its classical tradition of tolerance and hard-headed rationalism has been abandoned in favor of emotional jags and a vicious parochialism that eschews debate for “litmus tests” on ideological purity.
...
Until conservatives can practice some painful introspection, looking with a self-critical eye at the reasons for the debacles of 2006 and 2008, most in the movement will continue to delude themselves that simply reaffirming conservative love of small government, low taxes, and less regulation will be enough to convince a majority of Americans that they recognize their shortcomings and have changed their tune. There must be a reckoning with those who violate the very nature of conservatism by obstinately adhering to exclusionary, anti-intellectual precepts that have thrown classical conservatism over in favor of ranting, ideological tantrums.
-- Rich Moran for PajamasMedia.com
When Rush Limbaugh is considered to be your movement's leader and foremost voice, you know you're in trouble, and it's only healthy that you should be in trouble, as it shows that our country still has some good instincts.
Then there is the issue of hypocrisy. New Scientist has a study that draws a correlation between those states that more strongly profess religiously conservative values and those that consume more online pornography. One example:
States where a majority of residents agreed with the statement "I have old-fashioned values about family and marriage," bought 3.6 more subscriptions per thousand people than states where a majority disagreed. A similar difference emerged for the statement "AIDS might be God's punishment for immoral sexual behaviour."Religion may not be a bad thing, but its fundamentalist-activist strain seems to have a corruptive influence on politics and government. I like to think that America deserves to be ruled by a broader-minded tolerance, that freedom is about more than economic freedom, and that as a people we are more pragmatic than we are Christian fundamentalists - and that we are not "ditto heads".