monk222: (Noir Detective)

Would anyone care to make a bet on when life on earth is extinguished? You can.

I am glad to see that the Times is allowing John Tierney to maintain some visibility at the paper. A creative and quirky thinker. In this piece he writes about doomsday predictions and on betting on them. Gotta love the internet!

Tierney article )

xXx
monk222: (Noir Detective)

Would anyone care to make a bet on when life on earth is extinguished? You can.

I am glad to see that the Times is allowing John Tierney to maintain some visibility at the paper. A creative and quirky thinker. In this piece he writes about doomsday predictions and on betting on them. Gotta love the internet!

Tierney article )

xXx
monk222: (Peanuts)

Watching cable news last evening, I saw the wave of stories about new studies concluding that those government commercials shooing kids away from drugs do not work. It is suggested that kids actually find the commercials encouraging, because it projects a picture of drug-use being common and hence popular.

They aired the old commercials, and it made Monk feel nostalgic. Those commercials somehow feel like part of his growing up, or his coming of age. We are talking about the ones using eggs, 'This is your brain. And this is your brain on drugs.' Sizzle, sizzle! As well as the later variations, including the cute, busty brunette in a tight t-shirt smashing a frying pan around the kitchen.

One might think that declaratory messages coming from on high would not work so well in the world of teens. We know that they are just trying to keep us down, and we just want to be free and have some fun. Peers rule!

Nevertheless, it is striking how much of an impression such a relatively small advertising campaign can have. It is a part of our lives, something we have shared in common, and made fun of together.

Anyway, I thought I'd also include a John Tierney column from a few days ago, contrasting the situation in America with our War on Drugs against the situation in the Netherlands and its liberality. Maybe we really just need more freedom and fewer wars.

Tierney column )

xXx
monk222: (Peanuts)

Watching cable news last evening, I saw the wave of stories about new studies concluding that those government commercials shooing kids away from drugs do not work. It is suggested that kids actually find the commercials encouraging, because it projects a picture of drug-use being common and hence popular.

They aired the old commercials, and it made Monk feel nostalgic. Those commercials somehow feel like part of his growing up, or his coming of age. We are talking about the ones using eggs, 'This is your brain. And this is your brain on drugs.' Sizzle, sizzle! As well as the later variations, including the cute, busty brunette in a tight t-shirt smashing a frying pan around the kitchen.

One might think that declaratory messages coming from on high would not work so well in the world of teens. We know that they are just trying to keep us down, and we just want to be free and have some fun. Peers rule!

Nevertheless, it is striking how much of an impression such a relatively small advertising campaign can have. It is a part of our lives, something we have shared in common, and made fun of together.

Anyway, I thought I'd also include a John Tierney column from a few days ago, contrasting the situation in America with our War on Drugs against the situation in the Netherlands and its liberality. Maybe we really just need more freedom and fewer wars.

Tierney column )

xXx
monk222: (Flight)

The G.O.P. used to have a sizable libertarian bloc, but I couldn’t see any sign of it at the conference. Stone and Parker said they were rooting for Hillary Clinton in 2008 simply because it would be weird to have her as president. The prevailing sentiment among the rest of the libertarians was that the best outcome this November would be a Democratic majority in the House, because then at least there’d be gridlock.

... Stone and Parker told me they’d previously seen the G.O.P. as a relief from the big-government liberals, particularly the ones preaching to America from Hollywood. “We see these people lying, cheating, whoring,” Stone said. “They’re our friends, but seriously, they’re not people you want to listen to.”

The religious right used to be a better alternative, Parker said. “The Republicans didn’t want the government to run your life, because Jesus should. That was really part of their thing: less government, more Jesus. Now it’s like, how about more government and Jesus?”


-- John Tierney for The NY Times

Today has been a good day for the commentariat's philosphical, ideological struggles within our two-party system. In addition to Mr. Tierney's piece, Robert Tracinski has a deeper, if drier, essay titled "The Secular Right", which deals with his own concerns about the relationship between religion and politics, looking for a stronger libertarian politics.

Personally, while I also disfavor religion in government and policy, I see the issues as revolving around the fundamental question of trying to find a happy balance between liberty and equality, and see that we are not especially close to it, but we are at least on the right track, or at least a good track, in our political and ideological struggles, in contrast to the sort of dysfunctional and despotic regimes of the Muslim Middle East, China, and so on.

Tierney column )

xXx
monk222: (Flight)

The G.O.P. used to have a sizable libertarian bloc, but I couldn’t see any sign of it at the conference. Stone and Parker said they were rooting for Hillary Clinton in 2008 simply because it would be weird to have her as president. The prevailing sentiment among the rest of the libertarians was that the best outcome this November would be a Democratic majority in the House, because then at least there’d be gridlock.

... Stone and Parker told me they’d previously seen the G.O.P. as a relief from the big-government liberals, particularly the ones preaching to America from Hollywood. “We see these people lying, cheating, whoring,” Stone said. “They’re our friends, but seriously, they’re not people you want to listen to.”

The religious right used to be a better alternative, Parker said. “The Republicans didn’t want the government to run your life, because Jesus should. That was really part of their thing: less government, more Jesus. Now it’s like, how about more government and Jesus?”


-- John Tierney for The NY Times

Today has been a good day for the commentariat's philosphical, ideological struggles within our two-party system. In addition to Mr. Tierney's piece, Robert Tracinski has a deeper, if drier, essay titled "The Secular Right", which deals with his own concerns about the relationship between religion and politics, looking for a stronger libertarian politics.

Personally, while I also disfavor religion in government and policy, I see the issues as revolving around the fundamental question of trying to find a happy balance between liberty and equality, and see that we are not especially close to it, but we are at least on the right track, or at least a good track, in our political and ideological struggles, in contrast to the sort of dysfunctional and despotic regimes of the Muslim Middle East, China, and so on.

Tierney column )

xXx
monk222: (DarkSide: by spiraling_down)
~
Rising oil prices are making themselves felt again. Although we are not coming close to the long gas lines of the 1970s, the political turmoil in the Mideast makes for an ominous picture. We will tag a couple of pieces to capture some of the sense of this time.

Mr. John Tierney of The New York Times gives us an optimistic perspective, focusing on the long term, arguing that human ingenuity has always afforded society only more plentiful and cheaper natural resources - Cornucopian economics. One is more impressed with the fact that Tierney is moved to offer such a counterveiling argument.

However, even if the Cornucopian model were true, and should continue to be true, Mr. Fareed Zakaria offers a more sober analysis for the near term. Oil money takes away incentives for non-democratic regimes to reform and become more liberal democratic, and more directly, more oil money means more money into terrorist coffers.

And we also have that old joke that in the long term we are all dead.

Oil columns )

xXx
monk222: (DarkSide: by spiraling_down)
~
Rising oil prices are making themselves felt again. Although we are not coming close to the long gas lines of the 1970s, the political turmoil in the Mideast makes for an ominous picture. We will tag a couple of pieces to capture some of the sense of this time.

Mr. John Tierney of The New York Times gives us an optimistic perspective, focusing on the long term, arguing that human ingenuity has always afforded society only more plentiful and cheaper natural resources - Cornucopian economics. One is more impressed with the fact that Tierney is moved to offer such a counterveiling argument.

However, even if the Cornucopian model were true, and should continue to be true, Mr. Fareed Zakaria offers a more sober analysis for the near term. Oil money takes away incentives for non-democratic regimes to reform and become more liberal democratic, and more directly, more oil money means more money into terrorist coffers.

And we also have that old joke that in the long term we are all dead.

Oil columns )

xXx

Profile

monk222: (Default)
monk222

May 2019

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 06:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios