~
Which is the sexiest: boxers or briefs?
Monk has been wondrously preoccupied of late and his mind is still elsewhere. However, he has had a rather impassioned debate with a friend over men's underwear. He cannot believe that many can seriously maintain that boxers are hawt, as he regards these baggy underpants as being underwear for old folk. She insists that this is not the case anymore and that they are really TEH HAWT OMG!1! and that Monk just needs to get out to understand this.
We may have had a similar discussion along this theme before, but it was contaminated by the newfangled combo boxer-briefs, and one wants to keep this question pure, being between boxers and briefs only.
So, input would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
Which is the sexiest: boxers or briefs?
Monk has been wondrously preoccupied of late and his mind is still elsewhere. However, he has had a rather impassioned debate with a friend over men's underwear. He cannot believe that many can seriously maintain that boxers are hawt, as he regards these baggy underpants as being underwear for old folk. She insists that this is not the case anymore and that they are really TEH HAWT OMG!1! and that Monk just needs to get out to understand this.
We may have had a similar discussion along this theme before, but it was contaminated by the newfangled combo boxer-briefs, and one wants to keep this question pure, being between boxers and briefs only.
So, input would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 07:26 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 07:30 pm (UTC)From:Thanks! :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 08:56 am (UTC)From:What's weird to me about that is that I am such a visual person, but I find it better when you can't see anything.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 07:28 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 07:33 pm (UTC)From:Gabe/Furtive says hi! and the debate is with her and she says boxers, too. Oh, well.
Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 08:46 pm (UTC)From:(Though I will say that boxer-briefs take the cake. Yummy.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 08:53 pm (UTC)From:LOL That's a great shot. I'm sure my friend would appreciate it. I never thought of it that way.
Thanks! :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 09:42 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 09:59 pm (UTC)From:(Ahem, I wouldn't mind getting a vote for my side.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 10:03 pm (UTC)From:Yeah, I'm going to go with boxers, sorry.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 10:17 pm (UTC)From:But also he's got these boxers that aren't quite like "normal" boxers, in that they have the elastic around the waist and all, but the baggy material is of a softer cotton.. I think this makes it less stiff, and when he's standing in just those, and you can see.. package. *licks lips*
It's good stuff :D
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 10:27 pm (UTC)From:Glad to see you are so happy! :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 10:54 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 10:03 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 02:32 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 10:05 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 07:15 am (UTC)From:that said, i'm also not a huge fan of boxers.
i really prefer a man who goes commando.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 10:07 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 07:26 am (UTC)From:As a side note, a German medical study was making the rounds on TV this week earlier that a guy says thongs are unhealthy for women despite their ubiquity. Being a fan of good-old cotton granny-panties on hot chick, I won't complain. But it does say something that girls underwear has undergone something equal in the demographic shift.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 10:10 pm (UTC)From:So long as thongs are healthier for the sex life, I trust they will stay around - those quality of life issues. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 02:31 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 10:13 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 02:43 pm (UTC)From:Commando!Ahem. Boxers. Briefs go with little boys, or guys who are overly interested in showing off their packages. Prepubescence and vanity both turn me off.(And I think boxerbriefs on men fall more on the brief side of things. But I'd totally melt for a girl wearing boxerbriefs and packing. Ooooh.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-09 10:18 pm (UTC)From:You prefer more of a cocksureness? ;)
Beauty is in the eye of ...
Date: 2005-06-09 06:59 pm (UTC)From:I had a teacher ask me once,"So Memo, which is it, Boxers or briefs."
Having flashbacks of Clinton on MTV. I said nothing.
"It's probably briefs," she continued, "if you wear anything at all. Mmmm." Then she stared even more intently on my ass; obviously excited by the prospect of a Memo with-out underwear.
On the other hand, there lots of women that are totally sickened at the thought of someone NOT wearing either boxers or briefs.
Re: Beauty is in the eye of ...
Date: 2005-06-09 10:26 pm (UTC)From:Though, going by the response, I'm thinking one would be doing a better job of playing the odds by going with boxers.
Too shy back then to say to the teacher, "Show me yours and I'll show you mine"? ;)
Re: Beauty is in the eye of ...
Date: 2005-06-10 08:08 pm (UTC)From:Well, it was at a school that I was the computer guy at and that goes against one of my rules. Secondly, she was good looking but a sleeze. A dirty sleeze that was such a turn off.
Thirdly, If I did say something like that to her she would have not only hiked her skirt, but would have done me right there. I wanted no part of that.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-14 01:47 pm (UTC)From:I'm an ass girl and the glorious sight of a perfect ass in briefs... makes me wanna just sink my teeth in and bite! ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-14 10:00 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 01:38 pm (UTC)From:My vote is for boxers, simply for the fun factor.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-18 09:41 pm (UTC)From:Getting to this REALLY late...
Date: 2005-06-21 03:53 pm (UTC)From:Re: Getting to this REALLY late...
Date: 2005-06-22 10:52 am (UTC)From:Thanks for piling on! ;)