![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Bestiality
Mar. 12th, 2016 11:57 amNow that I am apparently spoiled by Motherless with its seemingly bottomless supply of rape scenes from around the world, I felt piqued to see just how far they go, recalling their boast of allowing absolutely everything legal. I was wondering: do they also have a deep stock in dog-on-women videos? I never really cared much for this porn delicacy, but I now felt some appetite to plunge deeper into the misogynistic mire. Maybe I am feeling more embittered in my old age, now that all my opportunities to enjoy romantic success have past me by and left me untouched: "Oh, you think I'm too much of a dog? Let's see you get fucked by a real dog, and show us your Linda Lovelace face, bitch!"
So, I went to Motherless and typed in "dog" in the search box, and I was in for a big surprise. And not a happy one. My screen lit up with a notice that I searched for a "banned word" and "This is a logged event!" I did something wrong and it's on record. But how wrong is it? Is it 'illegal' wrong? Logged for whom? The police? Is such porn illegal now? I could have sworn it was okay not so long ago. It perhaps had a certain stigma attached to it, but it wasn't illegal. I have now done some googling, and it does appear that just about 'everything goes, whatever floats your boat' so long as it does not include children. Though, I also saw on Wikipedia that 37 states have past laws against it, though, interestingly, this does not include Texas. I suppose that Motherless is playing it safe, which at least should give me some reassurance with respect to its pictures of youngish girls. Motherless is not an outlaw website. These days, you probably have to go to the Dark Net for the wild wild west, and I wouldn't know how to get there if my life depended on it.
When it comes to bestiality, there is also the issue of the welfare of the animal, aside from the questions of whether women are harmed or can meaningfully consent to engage in such acts. If it is wrong to have whales in sea parks, how can it be right to have dogs in pornography? Though, I submit that it is not a plain and easy case. It is by no means clear that the dogs really object to fucking upward in the hierarchy of the Animal Kingdom. In a hallway dialogue I joke that the dog might be happy to slap his paw on an ink pad and stamp his paw print on the contract, "Scooby snack, oh boy, oh boy!"
So, I went to Motherless and typed in "dog" in the search box, and I was in for a big surprise. And not a happy one. My screen lit up with a notice that I searched for a "banned word" and "This is a logged event!" I did something wrong and it's on record. But how wrong is it? Is it 'illegal' wrong? Logged for whom? The police? Is such porn illegal now? I could have sworn it was okay not so long ago. It perhaps had a certain stigma attached to it, but it wasn't illegal. I have now done some googling, and it does appear that just about 'everything goes, whatever floats your boat' so long as it does not include children. Though, I also saw on Wikipedia that 37 states have past laws against it, though, interestingly, this does not include Texas. I suppose that Motherless is playing it safe, which at least should give me some reassurance with respect to its pictures of youngish girls. Motherless is not an outlaw website. These days, you probably have to go to the Dark Net for the wild wild west, and I wouldn't know how to get there if my life depended on it.
When it comes to bestiality, there is also the issue of the welfare of the animal, aside from the questions of whether women are harmed or can meaningfully consent to engage in such acts. If it is wrong to have whales in sea parks, how can it be right to have dogs in pornography? Though, I submit that it is not a plain and easy case. It is by no means clear that the dogs really object to fucking upward in the hierarchy of the Animal Kingdom. In a hallway dialogue I joke that the dog might be happy to slap his paw on an ink pad and stamp his paw print on the contract, "Scooby snack, oh boy, oh boy!"
