monk222: (Noir Detective)
When it comes to erotica, although I tend to muck around in the nasty and rough stuff, I can certainly appreciate a more literary treatment. A few dashes of reality in sex scenes can make for a stirring poignancy. I never heard of James Salter before, but going by Alexander Chee's review, I'm going to have to add him to the wish list:

Too much writing about sex tries to either make it prettier or more serious, sexier or funnier or shocking, or anything, really, except what it is.... Whatever it is you desire appears from behind the veil of shame or fantasy or nostalgia, or sheer impossibility, and in its presence, you are revealed to yourself. Porn obscures this; porn is about the fantasy of the viewer, not the mixed fantasies, realities, and disappointments of the actors in the room. Truth might get you off, but porn doesn’t deal in maybes, was never interested in unreliable, unpredictable truth-telling. When my teacher told me to read James Salter, what she meant was that this kind of sex writing is about you, the reader, in a way a fantasy isn’t. It describes sex so that it tells you something about the story and the characters and yourself, all at once.

Sex and sadness often go together anyway, don't they? Life is funny like that. We need each other so badly, but then we cannot really stand each other.

Profile

monk222: (Default)
monk222

May 2019

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 05:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios