monk222: (Default)
LJ keeps rolling out big makeovers for the site, and they usually seem to be a big turn off, at least for the Anglo-sphere. And someone shared this viewpoint from the upper echelons of the owners and site-administrators:
Anton Nossik, an advisor to SUP Media, has not reacted favourably to criticism by site users. In an interview given in March 2008, he accused LiveJournal users of "trying to scare and blackmail us, threatening to destroy our business," and stated that a large class of users have as their only purpose bringing harm to LiveJournal and its owners; "their goal is to criticize, destabilize and ruin our reputation." In the interview, he predicted that his likely reaction to such pressure would be to retaliate against the users rather than bowing to their pressure.
I suppose this is the Russian way of doing business: love it or get purged! I don't know if LJ is hurting itself or not. The site was dying under the new Internet 2.0 - a relic in the fast-changing cyberworld. People say that the site is just being made to be much more like Facebook and Tumblr, which is what the masses seem to want.

Personally, I know I lost a lot of heart in the site a long time ago, but that has more to do with everyone going to those other sites, and my personal uncoolness was apparently becoming too evident as well, and it is just not the fun it used to be ten years ago, without the friends and little flirtations. But I am afraid that I am just one of those people for whom life generally tastes more sour as one ages - more losing, more dying, less hope, less joy.

(Source: LJ)
monk222: (Default)
Oh, LJ, LJ...

Last night, we could not see the comments, and this morning, I discovered that the ‘scheduled entries’ function is being quirky on how it is recording posting-times, and now I cannot get it to post for the right time at all, and the spoiler-cuts are no longer working.

The Russian administrators keep fiddling with it, apparently in the hopes of making LJ more like Tumblr or Twitter or Facebook, but mostly succeeding in making LiveJournal look like even more of a waste of time than it already has to too many former LJers.
monk222: (Default)
Oh, LJ, LJ...

Last night, we could not see the comments, and this morning, I discovered that the ‘scheduled entries’ function is being quirky on how it is recording posting-times, and now I cannot get it to post for the right time at all, and the spoiler-cuts are no longer working.

The Russian administrators keep fiddling with it, apparently in the hopes of making LJ more like Tumblr or Twitter or Facebook, but mostly succeeding in making LiveJournal look like even more of a waste of time than it already has to too many former LJers.
monk222: (DarkSide: by spiraling_down)
Wonderful, LJ’s ‘scheduled entries’ no longer works. Better yet, not only is it failing to post the entries, but it also eats up the entries that were supposed to be posted. Ain’t that grand? But one cannot honestly claim to be shocked. It is the sort of service one comes to expect from LJ nowadays. Though, in truth, I was getting the feeling that things were turning around, but it was just a tease, I guess. Maybe this is a little taste of what it is like to live in Russia. One can better appreciate where Ayn Rand is coming from in her adoration for efficient and effective businesses.
monk222: (DarkSide: by spiraling_down)
Wonderful, LJ’s ‘scheduled entries’ no longer works. Better yet, not only is it failing to post the entries, but it also eats up the entries that were supposed to be posted. Ain’t that grand? But one cannot honestly claim to be shocked. It is the sort of service one comes to expect from LJ nowadays. Though, in truth, I was getting the feeling that things were turning around, but it was just a tease, I guess. Maybe this is a little taste of what it is like to live in Russia. One can better appreciate where Ayn Rand is coming from in her adoration for efficient and effective businesses.

LiveJournal

Apr. 2nd, 2012 08:00 pm
monk222: (Mori: by tiger_ace)
We would like to take a moment of your time. As we all know, LJ is dying, ever since the sale to Russia. People are moving on. People are changing and growing apart.

-- LJ mod

So true.

Yet, in all fairness, although I do not care for the change in management, and even believe that Russia is a precarious ground for a business to be founded on, I think the decline of LiveJournal has more to do with the rise of Facebook. Facebook apparently does the social networking game better, and it has become easy to leave LiveJournal behind. Personally, I cannot really make the trasition, because e-freindships have also become more real-lifey, and I just don't have that kind of social capital. So, now, blogging for me is mostly about keeping all the shiny stuff that I come across on my Internet travels, and I suppose I fade away along with LJ.

LiveJournal

Apr. 2nd, 2012 08:00 pm
monk222: (Mori: by tiger_ace)
We would like to take a moment of your time. As we all know, LJ is dying, ever since the sale to Russia. People are moving on. People are changing and growing apart.

-- LJ mod

So true.

Yet, in all fairness, although I do not care for the change in management, and even believe that Russia is a precarious ground for a business to be founded on, I think the decline of LiveJournal has more to do with the rise of Facebook. Facebook apparently does the social networking game better, and it has become easy to leave LiveJournal behind. Personally, I cannot really make the trasition, because e-freindships have also become more real-lifey, and I just don't have that kind of social capital. So, now, blogging for me is mostly about keeping all the shiny stuff that I come across on my Internet travels, and I suppose I fade away along with LJ.
monk222: (Mori: by tiger_ace)
Wow, LJ just gets suckier and suckier. I just noticed that they have taken to automatically deleting all the comments of a person who has deleted their journals. I was sorry when LJ gave people the option of doing so on their own, but now I see that the mass deletion occurs whether the person wants it or not, and it is retroactive. It really ruins a lot of the nostalgic value of rereading old entries and seeing the comments of old friends. Oh, well, fuck it, life goes on. But, god, how about some good news sometime!
monk222: (Mori: by tiger_ace)
Wow, LJ just gets suckier and suckier. I just noticed that they have taken to automatically deleting all the comments of a person who has deleted their journals. I was sorry when LJ gave people the option of doing so on their own, but now I see that the mass deletion occurs whether the person wants it or not, and it is retroactive. It really ruins a lot of the nostalgic value of rereading old entries and seeing the comments of old friends. Oh, well, fuck it, life goes on. But, god, how about some good news sometime!
monk222: (Mori: by tiger_ace)
LiveJournal's leadership has made it clear that their future American business strategy lies in generating new traffic rather than catering to the service's current small-but-loyal membership.

-- News/ LJ

I can understand Brad's move to cash in on his ingenuity and efforts, but I wonder if he feels any pangs of regret over selling us out. Well, it's not like I have much of an e-life anyway, and so long as they can keep things running, I suppose it may not matter that much to me.

True, there is this sense that maybe it is time to put away childish things, but it's not like I have any good real-life options, and it still somehow feels a little meaningful to 'publish' my nonsense to the indifferent world at large, though a little more of the thrill wears off every year.

Read more... )
monk222: (Mori: by tiger_ace)
LiveJournal's leadership has made it clear that their future American business strategy lies in generating new traffic rather than catering to the service's current small-but-loyal membership.

-- News/ LJ

I can understand Brad's move to cash in on his ingenuity and efforts, but I wonder if he feels any pangs of regret over selling us out. Well, it's not like I have much of an e-life anyway, and so long as they can keep things running, I suppose it may not matter that much to me.

True, there is this sense that maybe it is time to put away childish things, but it's not like I have any good real-life options, and it still somehow feels a little meaningful to 'publish' my nonsense to the indifferent world at large, though a little more of the thrill wears off every year.

Read more... )
monk222: (Default)
“It’s not the end of the world, but I can see it from here.”

-- Patent Ochsner

LJ started it's major overhaul last week, and, to say the least, the new design was not received with a lot of fanfare. At the center of the storm is the removal of subject-headings for comments. I seldom use them myself, but I liked having the option, and the new move seemed more like a downgrade rather than an upgrade to me. As I read more on the controversy, I got the sinister impression that this big change is about the Russian owners deciding to make LiveJournal more theirs. They paid for the website and own it, so why shouldn't they play with it as they please, instead of letting it continue to bear so much of its original American heritage? I was starting to think it may be time to move my main blog, after all.

However, reading more on the matter, I realize that my paranoiac streak was showing. Denise at Dreamwidth gives us some good discussion about what is going on. I suppose one shouldn't be surprised that LJ is just doing what it can to survive in the new social media environment, trying to attract new users.

Read more... )
monk222: (Default)
“It’s not the end of the world, but I can see it from here.”

-- Patent Ochsner

LJ started it's major overhaul last week, and, to say the least, the new design was not received with a lot of fanfare. At the center of the storm is the removal of subject-headings for comments. I seldom use them myself, but I liked having the option, and the new move seemed more like a downgrade rather than an upgrade to me. As I read more on the controversy, I got the sinister impression that this big change is about the Russian owners deciding to make LiveJournal more theirs. They paid for the website and own it, so why shouldn't they play with it as they please, instead of letting it continue to bear so much of its original American heritage? I was starting to think it may be time to move my main blog, after all.

However, reading more on the matter, I realize that my paranoiac streak was showing. Denise at Dreamwidth gives us some good discussion about what is going on. I suppose one shouldn't be surprised that LJ is just doing what it can to survive in the new social media environment, trying to attract new users.

Read more... )
monk222: (DarkSide: by spiraling_down)
Things get curiouser and curiouser in LJ Land. I had heard the news that pro-Kremlin groups were attacking some government critics, and that we happy-go-lucky bloggers were just collateral damage, with the site crashing for hours at a time. Though, I did have my suspicions about the Russian government, and my doubts about LJ's viability were raised to the n-th degree, about how sensible it is to have one's e-home built on the shifting sands of Russian society, and whether I need to be more serious about nabbing a Dreadmwidth account, we now have a news story to give some heft to these dark thoughts, though the story itself also comes from Russia, and so who knows:

"The reason for attack is more than clear in this case — someone wants LiveJournal to disappear as a platform," he said Tuesday in a post on his own LiveJournal blog, Igrick.

The hackers sought to leave the Russian blogosphere without a single stable platform to operate on, dispersing them to other social networks where "it's easier to fight individual users," Dronov wrote.

He stopped short of naming any names, predicting only that more attacks would follow. SUP will have to ship more powerful equipment to Russia to resist further attacks, Dronov said.

The company "doesn't exclude a lawsuit option," Svetlana Ivannikov, head of LiveJournal Russia, said late Monday in a statement. But she also identified no suspects.

Bloggers, however, minced no words, naming the Kremlin as the only power capable of staging such a large attack.
On the other hand, I do like one LJer's comment, despite its muddy syntax and semantics: "Suuurrreee, like the government if they really needed it wouldn't be able to make shut up a few people without causing a global scandal." It does make more sense to me that this was the work of a Russian sort of 4Chan group. Either way, one does not feel a lot of confidence in LJ's Russian connections.
monk222: (DarkSide: by spiraling_down)
Things get curiouser and curiouser in LJ Land. I had heard the news that pro-Kremlin groups were attacking some government critics, and that we happy-go-lucky bloggers were just collateral damage, with the site crashing for hours at a time. Though, I did have my suspicions about the Russian government, and my doubts about LJ's viability were raised to the n-th degree, about how sensible it is to have one's e-home built on the shifting sands of Russian society, and whether I need to be more serious about nabbing a Dreadmwidth account, we now have a news story to give some heft to these dark thoughts, though the story itself also comes from Russia, and so who knows:

"The reason for attack is more than clear in this case — someone wants LiveJournal to disappear as a platform," he said Tuesday in a post on his own LiveJournal blog, Igrick.

The hackers sought to leave the Russian blogosphere without a single stable platform to operate on, dispersing them to other social networks where "it's easier to fight individual users," Dronov wrote.

He stopped short of naming any names, predicting only that more attacks would follow. SUP will have to ship more powerful equipment to Russia to resist further attacks, Dronov said.

The company "doesn't exclude a lawsuit option," Svetlana Ivannikov, head of LiveJournal Russia, said late Monday in a statement. But she also identified no suspects.

Bloggers, however, minced no words, naming the Kremlin as the only power capable of staging such a large attack.
On the other hand, I do like one LJer's comment, despite its muddy syntax and semantics: "Suuurrreee, like the government if they really needed it wouldn't be able to make shut up a few people without causing a global scandal." It does make more sense to me that this was the work of a Russian sort of 4Chan group. Either way, one does not feel a lot of confidence in LJ's Russian connections.
monk222: (Noir Detective)
In LJ’s political communities, there is some buzz about a conservative blogger, Solly Forell, who apparently was unaware that, for all of America’s near-absolutism on Free Speech, we do have some laws about threatening the life of the president of the United States, and who posted some blatant tweets on his Twitter calling for Obama’s assassination. And there is much schadenfreude about Solly’s future visit by the Secret Service.

In the course of that discussion, I came across a story about an LJer who got in similar hot water in 2004 over an LJ post joking about President George W. Bush:

A couple of weeks ago, following the last presidential debate, I said some rather inflammatory things about George W. Bush in a public post in my LJ, done in a satirical style. We laughed, we ranted, we all said some things. I thought it was a fairly harmless (and rather obvious) attempt at humor in the face of annoyance, and while a couple of people were offended, as is typical behavior from me, I saw something shiny and forgot about it, thinking that the whole thing was over and done and nothing else would come of what I said.

I was wrong.

At 9:45 last night, the Secret Service showed up on my mother's front door to talk to me about what I said about the President, as what I said could apparently be misconstrued as a threat to his life. After about ten minutes of talking to me and my family, they quickly came to the conclusion that I was not a threat to national security (mostly because we are the least threatening people in the entire world) and told me that they would not recommend that any further action be taken with my case. However, I do now have a file with the FBI that includes my photograph, my e-mail address, and the location of my LJ. This will follow me around for the rest of my life, regardless of the fact that the Secret Service knows that I am not a threat.
Since the law is conveniently stated in one of the posts, I may as well copy and paste it here:

Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
I wonder if this law also applies to rape jokes about these top political leaders, or is there an understood tradition about ‘buggering’ jokes? In any case, being a worrisome sort, I think it would be best to refrain from any humor or commentary that connects any violence to any of our national leaders, and maybe that should include state political leaders, too, in the interest of being perfectly safe. As far as concerns about free speech go, this law does carve only a very small exception. I’m much more concerned about the proscriptions on our porn.
monk222: (Noir Detective)
In LJ’s political communities, there is some buzz about a conservative blogger, Solly Forell, who apparently was unaware that, for all of America’s near-absolutism on Free Speech, we do have some laws about threatening the life of the president of the United States, and who posted some blatant tweets on his Twitter calling for Obama’s assassination. And there is much schadenfreude about Solly’s future visit by the Secret Service.

In the course of that discussion, I came across a story about an LJer who got in similar hot water in 2004 over an LJ post joking about President George W. Bush:

A couple of weeks ago, following the last presidential debate, I said some rather inflammatory things about George W. Bush in a public post in my LJ, done in a satirical style. We laughed, we ranted, we all said some things. I thought it was a fairly harmless (and rather obvious) attempt at humor in the face of annoyance, and while a couple of people were offended, as is typical behavior from me, I saw something shiny and forgot about it, thinking that the whole thing was over and done and nothing else would come of what I said.

I was wrong.

At 9:45 last night, the Secret Service showed up on my mother's front door to talk to me about what I said about the President, as what I said could apparently be misconstrued as a threat to his life. After about ten minutes of talking to me and my family, they quickly came to the conclusion that I was not a threat to national security (mostly because we are the least threatening people in the entire world) and told me that they would not recommend that any further action be taken with my case. However, I do now have a file with the FBI that includes my photograph, my e-mail address, and the location of my LJ. This will follow me around for the rest of my life, regardless of the fact that the Secret Service knows that I am not a threat.
Since the law is conveniently stated in one of the posts, I may as well copy and paste it here:

Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
I wonder if this law also applies to rape jokes about these top political leaders, or is there an understood tradition about ‘buggering’ jokes? In any case, being a worrisome sort, I think it would be best to refrain from any humor or commentary that connects any violence to any of our national leaders, and maybe that should include state political leaders, too, in the interest of being perfectly safe. As far as concerns about free speech go, this law does carve only a very small exception. I’m much more concerned about the proscriptions on our porn.
monk222: (Devil)
LiveJournal has been here for ten years and some of its users nearly that long. What LJ does well has never been duplicated -- it's community driven, it's content driven. It's users are content producers. LJ is unique in social networking sites in that it has become a valuable repository for people's memories -- it truly has taken the place of a paper journal and many people have forsaken their handwritten diaries for an LJ which has many additional benefits but one serious drawback -- the threat of impermanence. While many people probably wouldn't consider trying to archive their Facebook status updates, many of us look to our LiveJournal's as an official personal history -- a document that needs to be preserved for future reference and grows in value each day.

-- Kyle Cassidy

This is taken from Mr. Cassidy's nomination proposal in his bid to win election to LJ's Advisory Board. I finally read through the proposals and was rather won over by this sentiment. I was also reading through the candidates' personal journals, and I gather some people feel that Cassidy is practically a lock for the election, since he is a collaborator and pal of Neil Gaiman, and Gaiman has thrown his weight behind him. Maybe. The only thing I'm concerned about is whether Cassidy may be too pure of heart and may throw his weight behind efforts to push out the more pornish aspects of LJ, especially the dark and fetishistic stuff, as if the puritanism weren't bad enough. Ah, my lovely Blossom!
monk222: (Devil)
LiveJournal has been here for ten years and some of its users nearly that long. What LJ does well has never been duplicated -- it's community driven, it's content driven. It's users are content producers. LJ is unique in social networking sites in that it has become a valuable repository for people's memories -- it truly has taken the place of a paper journal and many people have forsaken their handwritten diaries for an LJ which has many additional benefits but one serious drawback -- the threat of impermanence. While many people probably wouldn't consider trying to archive their Facebook status updates, many of us look to our LiveJournal's as an official personal history -- a document that needs to be preserved for future reference and grows in value each day.

-- Kyle Cassidy

This is taken from Mr. Cassidy's nomination proposal in his bid to win election to LJ's Advisory Board. I finally read through the proposals and was rather won over by this sentiment. I was also reading through the candidates' personal journals, and I gather some people feel that Cassidy is practically a lock for the election, since he is a collaborator and pal of Neil Gaiman, and Gaiman has thrown his weight behind him. Maybe. The only thing I'm concerned about is whether Cassidy may be too pure of heart and may throw his weight behind efforts to push out the more pornish aspects of LJ, especially the dark and fetishistic stuff, as if the puritanism weren't bad enough. Ah, my lovely Blossom!
monk222: (Noir Detective)
"LiveJournal as a business."

That's the whole problem to begin with. While it's understandable to ask for donations or even to have certain paid services and products in order to keep the service running, looking at LiveJournal as a business was the wrong attitude from the beginning. Trying to turn it into a business is what's caused half of all the problems encountered by people working for LJ or by any person or business that's owned LJ.

LiveJournal should always be a service first, dedicated to the users (notice I didn't say customers) before anything else. It should never, ever have been turned over to corporate meddling.


-- LJer

That comment came in response to LJ's news post on the downsizing, and I think that sums up where I was heading. I believed the problem started with Brad's decision to take on ads, and it quickly went downhill to the present situation. However, it's hard not to respect Brad's decision to profit from his grand idea and enterprise, though it now leaves us in a bind, since we cannot run as a profit-oriented business. Any enterprise requires money and resources, but this had to be more about love than making big money.
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 04:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios