Oct. 20th, 2012
Lo (F) A Case History
Oct. 20th, 2012 12:30 pmIn John Ray’s closing paragraph we have less of a parody of porn-book prefaces and more of a direct imitation, and I have read and wanked to enough of them to be something of an expert. For those who are unread in this genre, such prefaces are assuring readers and would-be censors that the book has socially redeeming value and is hardly mere smut for our masturabatory pleasure. This is really educational! In the case of “Lolita”, of course, this is more than pretense.
_ _ _
As a case history, “Lolita” will become, no doubt, a classic in psychiatric circles. As a work of art, it transcends its expiatory aspects; and still more important to us than scientific significance and literary worth, is the ethical impact the book should have on the serious reader; for in this poignant personal study there lurks a general lesson; the wayward child, the egotistic mother, the panting maniac - these are not only vivid characters in a unique story: they warn us of dangerous trends; they point out potent evils. “Lolita” should make all of us - parents, social workers, educators - apply ourselves with still greater vigilance and vision to the task of bringing up a better generation in a safer world.
-- "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov
_ _ _
John Ray dates his note: August 5, 1955. The main narrative, involving Lolita and Humbert, occurs from the late 1940s through the early 1950s, the fresh beginning of the post-World War Two era with America in ascendent triumph and beginning a golden age of sorts, despite Humbert’s soiling of the country and one of its all-American darlings.
_ _ _
As a case history, “Lolita” will become, no doubt, a classic in psychiatric circles. As a work of art, it transcends its expiatory aspects; and still more important to us than scientific significance and literary worth, is the ethical impact the book should have on the serious reader; for in this poignant personal study there lurks a general lesson; the wayward child, the egotistic mother, the panting maniac - these are not only vivid characters in a unique story: they warn us of dangerous trends; they point out potent evils. “Lolita” should make all of us - parents, social workers, educators - apply ourselves with still greater vigilance and vision to the task of bringing up a better generation in a safer world.
-- "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov
_ _ _
John Ray dates his note: August 5, 1955. The main narrative, involving Lolita and Humbert, occurs from the late 1940s through the early 1950s, the fresh beginning of the post-World War Two era with America in ascendent triumph and beginning a golden age of sorts, despite Humbert’s soiling of the country and one of its all-American darlings.
Lo (F) A Case History
Oct. 20th, 2012 12:30 pmIn John Ray’s closing paragraph we have less of a parody of porn-book prefaces and more of a direct imitation, and I have read and wanked to enough of them to be something of an expert. For those who are unread in this genre, such prefaces are assuring readers and would-be censors that the book has socially redeeming value and is hardly mere smut for our masturabatory pleasure. This is really educational! In the case of “Lolita”, of course, this is more than pretense.
_ _ _
As a case history, “Lolita” will become, no doubt, a classic in psychiatric circles. As a work of art, it transcends its expiatory aspects; and still more important to us than scientific significance and literary worth, is the ethical impact the book should have on the serious reader; for in this poignant personal study there lurks a general lesson; the wayward child, the egotistic mother, the panting maniac - these are not only vivid characters in a unique story: they warn us of dangerous trends; they point out potent evils. “Lolita” should make all of us - parents, social workers, educators - apply ourselves with still greater vigilance and vision to the task of bringing up a better generation in a safer world.
-- "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov
_ _ _
John Ray dates his note: August 5, 1955. The main narrative, involving Lolita and Humbert, occurs from the late 1940s through the early 1950s, the fresh beginning of the post-World War Two era with America in ascendent triumph and beginning a golden age of sorts, despite Humbert’s soiling of the country and one of its all-American darlings.
_ _ _
As a case history, “Lolita” will become, no doubt, a classic in psychiatric circles. As a work of art, it transcends its expiatory aspects; and still more important to us than scientific significance and literary worth, is the ethical impact the book should have on the serious reader; for in this poignant personal study there lurks a general lesson; the wayward child, the egotistic mother, the panting maniac - these are not only vivid characters in a unique story: they warn us of dangerous trends; they point out potent evils. “Lolita” should make all of us - parents, social workers, educators - apply ourselves with still greater vigilance and vision to the task of bringing up a better generation in a safer world.
-- "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov
_ _ _
John Ray dates his note: August 5, 1955. The main narrative, involving Lolita and Humbert, occurs from the late 1940s through the early 1950s, the fresh beginning of the post-World War Two era with America in ascendent triumph and beginning a golden age of sorts, despite Humbert’s soiling of the country and one of its all-American darlings.
Writers Twice As Likely To Commit Suicide
Oct. 20th, 2012 02:06 pmIf one wanted scientific confirmation that writers and artists tend to be mentally ill, I guess we got it for you. I wonder if this applies to wanna-be writers. Probably not. Though, I suppose you do not have to be an artist to be crazy.
( Read more... )
( Read more... )
Writers Twice As Likely To Commit Suicide
Oct. 20th, 2012 02:06 pmIf one wanted scientific confirmation that writers and artists tend to be mentally ill, I guess we got it for you. I wonder if this applies to wanna-be writers. Probably not. Though, I suppose you do not have to be an artist to be crazy.
( Read more... )
( Read more... )
Michael Jackson: Bad 25
Oct. 20th, 2012 04:18 pmSpike Lee has a documentary on Michael Jackson that will be airing around the Thanksgiving holiday, titled "Bad 25". I should record it.

Celebrating the 25th anniversary of Michael Jackson’s “Bad” album and subsequent world tour, “Bad 25” reintroduces us to an artist viewed too often through the prism of tabloid speculation.
Deconstructing the design and shooting of the album’s videos -- or, as Jackson insisted on calling them, short films -- the director, Spike Lee, assembles a fond and meticulously detailed mosaic of a perfectionist at work. Buoyant interviews with Jackson’s friends, collaborators and business partners supply a deluge of revealing yarns and trivia, while priceless rehearsal footage offers glimpses of a genuinely sweet personality. Though at times a tad worshipful, the film’s tone is ultimately more awed than hagiographic, its commenters too cleareyed and candid to back away from negative publicity or public disenchantment.
Filled with oh-wow moments -- like a 1988 clip of Sheryl Crow, with mountainous hair, partnering Jackson in the ballad “I Just Can’t Stop Loving You” -- “Bad 25” confirms the genius of an authentic pop original.
-- ONTD

Celebrating the 25th anniversary of Michael Jackson’s “Bad” album and subsequent world tour, “Bad 25” reintroduces us to an artist viewed too often through the prism of tabloid speculation.
Deconstructing the design and shooting of the album’s videos -- or, as Jackson insisted on calling them, short films -- the director, Spike Lee, assembles a fond and meticulously detailed mosaic of a perfectionist at work. Buoyant interviews with Jackson’s friends, collaborators and business partners supply a deluge of revealing yarns and trivia, while priceless rehearsal footage offers glimpses of a genuinely sweet personality. Though at times a tad worshipful, the film’s tone is ultimately more awed than hagiographic, its commenters too cleareyed and candid to back away from negative publicity or public disenchantment.
Filled with oh-wow moments -- like a 1988 clip of Sheryl Crow, with mountainous hair, partnering Jackson in the ballad “I Just Can’t Stop Loving You” -- “Bad 25” confirms the genius of an authentic pop original.
-- ONTD
Michael Jackson: Bad 25
Oct. 20th, 2012 04:18 pmSpike Lee has a documentary on Michael Jackson that will be airing around the Thanksgiving holiday, titled "Bad 25". I should record it.

Celebrating the 25th anniversary of Michael Jackson’s “Bad” album and subsequent world tour, “Bad 25” reintroduces us to an artist viewed too often through the prism of tabloid speculation.
Deconstructing the design and shooting of the album’s videos -- or, as Jackson insisted on calling them, short films -- the director, Spike Lee, assembles a fond and meticulously detailed mosaic of a perfectionist at work. Buoyant interviews with Jackson’s friends, collaborators and business partners supply a deluge of revealing yarns and trivia, while priceless rehearsal footage offers glimpses of a genuinely sweet personality. Though at times a tad worshipful, the film’s tone is ultimately more awed than hagiographic, its commenters too cleareyed and candid to back away from negative publicity or public disenchantment.
Filled with oh-wow moments -- like a 1988 clip of Sheryl Crow, with mountainous hair, partnering Jackson in the ballad “I Just Can’t Stop Loving You” -- “Bad 25” confirms the genius of an authentic pop original.
-- ONTD

Celebrating the 25th anniversary of Michael Jackson’s “Bad” album and subsequent world tour, “Bad 25” reintroduces us to an artist viewed too often through the prism of tabloid speculation.
Deconstructing the design and shooting of the album’s videos -- or, as Jackson insisted on calling them, short films -- the director, Spike Lee, assembles a fond and meticulously detailed mosaic of a perfectionist at work. Buoyant interviews with Jackson’s friends, collaborators and business partners supply a deluge of revealing yarns and trivia, while priceless rehearsal footage offers glimpses of a genuinely sweet personality. Though at times a tad worshipful, the film’s tone is ultimately more awed than hagiographic, its commenters too cleareyed and candid to back away from negative publicity or public disenchantment.
Filled with oh-wow moments -- like a 1988 clip of Sheryl Crow, with mountainous hair, partnering Jackson in the ballad “I Just Can’t Stop Loving You” -- “Bad 25” confirms the genius of an authentic pop original.
-- ONTD