AMID the squawks and pings of our digital devices, the old-fashioned virtues of reading novels can seem faded, even futile. But new support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience. [...]
The brain, it seems, does not make much of a distinction between reading about an experience and encountering it in real life; in each case, the same neurological regions are stimulated. Keith Oatley, an emeritus professor of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto (and a published novelist), has proposed that reading produces a vivid simulation of reality, one that “runs on minds of readers just as computer simulations run on computers.” Fiction — with its redolent details, imaginative metaphors and attentive descriptions of people and their actions — offers an especially rich replica. Indeed, in one respect novels go beyond simulating reality to give readers an experience unavailable off the page: the opportunity to enter fully into other people’s thoughts and feelings. --
Annie Murphy Paul at The New York TimesImagine the thrill of pornography, eh?
More seriously, I doubt there are many people who have gone as far as I have in seeking to live in books for want of being able to live with others in society, and we are obviously not talking about a true substitute. Reading about friendship is not the same as enjoying a meal and a few laughs with real friends. Reading about sex is not the same as the sharp, intense thrill of burying yourself up between her legs, the climax of emptying yourself deep inside her, your sweaty body falling limp on her sweaty body, your heartbeats winding back down to normal, her arms hugging you tighter. Even the best literature cannot do that for you.
Still, literature is something, and I doubt I would still be here without it. A well-wrought dream can be pretty intoxicating too, in its own more modest way, offering one a taste of life.