Sep. 4th, 2011

monk222: (Flight)
In recent years, we have seen a lot of attempts to sort of scientifically explain and understand why so many people believe in God and such supernaturalism. And I thought this was a nice counter-move.

_ _ _

Except that man isn’t god-leaning, he’s god-obsessed.

We are god-obsessed and god-seeking and at least the intellectuals of earlier ages—even if they couldn’t bring themselves to belief—recognized this. So many of today’s intellectuals are so far removed from religion that they don’t know the half of how deeply it’s intertwined in the lives and hearts of the rest of us.

This is perhaps the chief reason why so much of modern film and fiction feels false, because its creators are downright unnatural in their self-enforced secularization. Only in modern American novels does no one go to church, or pray to Christ or Allah or Shiva when they get cancer, or worry over the souls of their children.

We are god-obsessed because we have lost God or we are running from God or we are hopelessly seeking Him, and maybe all of these at once.

We are god-obsessed the way a child snatched from his mother will always have his heart and flesh tuned to her, even after he forgets her face. Cover the earth with orphans and you will find grown men fashioning images of mothers and worshipping strong women and crafting myths about mothers who have left or were taken or whose spirits dwell in the trees.

And at the edges of their tribal fires will stand the anthropologist and the philosopher, reasoning that all this mother-talk is simply proof that men are prone to invent stories about mothers, which is itself proof that no single story about a mother could be true, which is proof that the brain just evolved to work that way.

It’s the only narrative that fits the facts while affirming the skeptic’s presupposition that all this mother business is just leftover hokum from the dark ages.

Except that in a century, when the most famous of the skeptics is long forgotten, broken men will still be telling stories about what we have lost, and what we pray is still out there, coming even now to set all things right.

-- Tony Woodlief
monk222: (Flight)
In recent years, we have seen a lot of attempts to sort of scientifically explain and understand why so many people believe in God and such supernaturalism. And I thought this was a nice counter-move.

_ _ _

Except that man isn’t god-leaning, he’s god-obsessed.

We are god-obsessed and god-seeking and at least the intellectuals of earlier ages—even if they couldn’t bring themselves to belief—recognized this. So many of today’s intellectuals are so far removed from religion that they don’t know the half of how deeply it’s intertwined in the lives and hearts of the rest of us.

This is perhaps the chief reason why so much of modern film and fiction feels false, because its creators are downright unnatural in their self-enforced secularization. Only in modern American novels does no one go to church, or pray to Christ or Allah or Shiva when they get cancer, or worry over the souls of their children.

We are god-obsessed because we have lost God or we are running from God or we are hopelessly seeking Him, and maybe all of these at once.

We are god-obsessed the way a child snatched from his mother will always have his heart and flesh tuned to her, even after he forgets her face. Cover the earth with orphans and you will find grown men fashioning images of mothers and worshipping strong women and crafting myths about mothers who have left or were taken or whose spirits dwell in the trees.

And at the edges of their tribal fires will stand the anthropologist and the philosopher, reasoning that all this mother-talk is simply proof that men are prone to invent stories about mothers, which is itself proof that no single story about a mother could be true, which is proof that the brain just evolved to work that way.

It’s the only narrative that fits the facts while affirming the skeptic’s presupposition that all this mother business is just leftover hokum from the dark ages.

Except that in a century, when the most famous of the skeptics is long forgotten, broken men will still be telling stories about what we have lost, and what we pray is still out there, coming even now to set all things right.

-- Tony Woodlief
monk222: (Flight)
You won’t believe it, but I’m seriously playing with the idea of letting the cats enjoy the outdoors all day if they want.

I sensed this morning that we were feeling a real autumnal shift, and I see on Pop’s weather widget that the highs are suppose to be around the ninety mark rather than a hundred.

If this is real, and not just a weekend blip, it also may be time to start thinking about my library trip and my chicken fried rice.

*******

1020

Okay, I chickened out on letting the cats go, with the temperature already hitting 93 degrees and it’s not even ten-thirty yet. But we’re getting there, maybe.

I think Sammy is upset with me for teasing him like this.

*******

1330

Back to a 104 degrees. I was thinking 94 was going to be the high. The heatwave remains unbroken.
monk222: (Flight)
You won’t believe it, but I’m seriously playing with the idea of letting the cats enjoy the outdoors all day if they want.

I sensed this morning that we were feeling a real autumnal shift, and I see on Pop’s weather widget that the highs are suppose to be around the ninety mark rather than a hundred.

If this is real, and not just a weekend blip, it also may be time to start thinking about my library trip and my chicken fried rice.

*******

1020

Okay, I chickened out on letting the cats go, with the temperature already hitting 93 degrees and it’s not even ten-thirty yet. But we’re getting there, maybe.

I think Sammy is upset with me for teasing him like this.

*******

1330

Back to a 104 degrees. I was thinking 94 was going to be the high. The heatwave remains unbroken.
monk222: (Rainy: by snorkle_c)
Maureen Dowd uses her column to do what all good liberals must be doing now, that is, to despair of Obama and his failure to rise to the challenge of Republican opposition. And I think she is particularly insightful and hits the mark when she speculates that a big part of the problem is that Obama still aspires to be part of the royally wealthy class, which may indeed be why he is so deferential to Wall Street and big corporations, rather than fighting them FDR-style. I think she has found the key to understanding Obama's soul. He wants to set up his family to be part of the true American aristocracy, and this is his real cause. Oh, yes you can!

Dowd Excerpt )

monk222: (Rainy: by snorkle_c)
Maureen Dowd uses her column to do what all good liberals must be doing now, that is, to despair of Obama and his failure to rise to the challenge of Republican opposition. And I think she is particularly insightful and hits the mark when she speculates that a big part of the problem is that Obama still aspires to be part of the royally wealthy class, which may indeed be why he is so deferential to Wall Street and big corporations, rather than fighting them FDR-style. I think she has found the key to understanding Obama's soul. He wants to set up his family to be part of the true American aristocracy, and this is his real cause. Oh, yes you can!

Dowd Excerpt )

monk222: (Strip)


In this world it doesn't help to be shy.
monk222: (Strip)


In this world it doesn't help to be shy.

Profile

monk222: (Default)
monk222

May 2019

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 4th, 2025 08:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios