The Curious Turns of Robert Nozick
Jul. 1st, 2011 07:50 am "The libertarian position I once propounded," Nozick wrote in an essay published in the late '80s, "now seems to me seriously inadequate." In Anarchy democracy was nowhere to be found; Nozick now believed that democratic institutions "express and symbolize … our equal human dignity, our autonomy and powers of self-direction." In Anarchy, the best government was the least government, a value-neutral enforcer of contracts; now, Nozick concluded, "There are some things we choose to do together through government in solemn marking of our human solidarity, served by the fact that we do them together in this official fashion ..."
-- Stephen Metcalf at Slate.com
Wow, I didn't know that Nozick converted. I feel cheated for not knowing that twenty years ago. I remember well how Nozick, with his defense of libertarianism, was still a force in my undergraduate seminar on jurisprudence in the mid-eighties. Apparently, it was not long after that that he renounced his position, himself. Though, I don't suppose the big libertarians in the room would feel especially red-faced. It's enough to be rich. Who needs philosophical principle?
( article )
-- Stephen Metcalf at Slate.com
Wow, I didn't know that Nozick converted. I feel cheated for not knowing that twenty years ago. I remember well how Nozick, with his defense of libertarianism, was still a force in my undergraduate seminar on jurisprudence in the mid-eighties. Apparently, it was not long after that that he renounced his position, himself. Though, I don't suppose the big libertarians in the room would feel especially red-faced. It's enough to be rich. Who needs philosophical principle?
( article )