Of Philosophy
Nov. 19th, 2010 10:07 pm“Philosophy does not contribute to our knowledge of the world we live in after the manner of any of the natural sciences. You can ask any scientist to show you the achievements of science over the past millennium, and they have much to show: libraries full of well-established facts and well-confirmed theories. If you ask a philosopher to produce a handbook of well-established and unchallengeable philosophical truths, there’s nothing to show. I think that is because philosophy is not a quest for knowledge about the world, but rather a quest for understanding the conceptual scheme in terms of which we conceive of the knowledge we achieve about the world. One of the rewards of doing philosophy is a clearer understanding of the way we think about ourselves and about the world we live in, not fresh facts about reality.”
-- Peter Hacker
I'm keeping this one mainly for the few seriously philosophically inclined friends of mine. My idea of philosophy is more the exercise of coming to terms with our life in the world and with our dying, or to put it in the old and now trite-sounding formula: what is the meaning of life? Kind of religious in spirit you might say, and more literary than analytic - and at least as dismal as economics, I should think.
-- Peter Hacker
I'm keeping this one mainly for the few seriously philosophically inclined friends of mine. My idea of philosophy is more the exercise of coming to terms with our life in the world and with our dying, or to put it in the old and now trite-sounding formula: what is the meaning of life? Kind of religious in spirit you might say, and more literary than analytic - and at least as dismal as economics, I should think.