May. 1st, 2009

monk222: (Devil)
I open the Times and I see that Krugman and Brooks both have columns that promise to be interesting, and I immediately feel the strong urge to have cookies and a coke for breakfast, to be enjoyed while reading them and going about my news rounds. I shouldn't. I had a sweet breakfast yesterday. But the thought of cereal isn't doing it for me. I wanted this snack last night and denied myself. So, it looks like I'm going to give in now.
monk222: (Devil)
I open the Times and I see that Krugman and Brooks both have columns that promise to be interesting, and I immediately feel the strong urge to have cookies and a coke for breakfast, to be enjoyed while reading them and going about my news rounds. I shouldn't. I had a sweet breakfast yesterday. But the thought of cereal isn't doing it for me. I wanted this snack last night and denied myself. So, it looks like I'm going to give in now.

Genius

May. 1st, 2009 08:05 am
monk222: (Default)
Some people live in romantic ages. They tend to believe that genius is the product of a divine spark. They believe that there have been, throughout the ages, certain paragons of greatness — Dante, Mozart, Einstein — whose talents far exceeded normal comprehension, who had an other-worldly access to transcendent truth, and who are best approached with reverential awe.

...

The latest research suggests a more prosaic, democratic, even puritanical view of the world. The key factor separating geniuses from the merely accomplished is not a divine spark. It’s not I.Q., a generally bad predictor of success, even in realms like chess. Instead, it’s deliberate practice. Top performers spend more hours (many more hours) rigorously practicing their craft.


-- David Brooks for The New York Times

I wonder if it's too late to start now!

Genius

May. 1st, 2009 08:05 am
monk222: (Default)
Some people live in romantic ages. They tend to believe that genius is the product of a divine spark. They believe that there have been, throughout the ages, certain paragons of greatness — Dante, Mozart, Einstein — whose talents far exceeded normal comprehension, who had an other-worldly access to transcendent truth, and who are best approached with reverential awe.

...

The latest research suggests a more prosaic, democratic, even puritanical view of the world. The key factor separating geniuses from the merely accomplished is not a divine spark. It’s not I.Q., a generally bad predictor of success, even in realms like chess. Instead, it’s deliberate practice. Top performers spend more hours (many more hours) rigorously practicing their craft.


-- David Brooks for The New York Times

I wonder if it's too late to start now!

The Cats

May. 1st, 2009 08:39 am
monk222: (Flight)
I found a way to keep the Siamese from squealing all the time when I hold him, and that's to hold both kittens at the same time. They apparently feel secure when in contact with each other. And I got to hold them a little longer this morning. However, I'm afraid that this may not help to 'break them in', since they may not be focusing at all on the fact that a friendly human is holding them.

The Cats

May. 1st, 2009 08:39 am
monk222: (Flight)
I found a way to keep the Siamese from squealing all the time when I hold him, and that's to hold both kittens at the same time. They apparently feel secure when in contact with each other. And I got to hold them a little longer this morning. However, I'm afraid that this may not help to 'break them in', since they may not be focusing at all on the fact that a friendly human is holding them.

Profile

monk222: (Default)
monk222

May 2019

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 15th, 2025 01:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios