False Morality and Bland Entertainment
Apr. 16th, 2007 12:25 am♠
Maybe I'm just too jaded and out of step with something truly good that might be in the process of happening, that is, a move to a more santized culture. We've been headed this way for some time - long gone are the heady days of the seventies, when entertainment was wild and fun, and sexploitation, for instance, ran free on movie screens. Now, there is this expression of a will to go back to the days of false decency, in which representations in entertainment are limited to our best behavior, the days of "Father Knows Best" or "Leave It To Beaver" or "The Andy Griffiths Show." Bleh.
Mind you, I'm not saying that we should not have realms of higher discourse. It's just that it is inhibiting and stultifying and hypocritical to impose full-scale political correctness on all outlets. For instance, I suppose they don't even want people to be free on satellite radio, so that not even Howard Stern can have his lesbian contests to see how much they can turn men on.
After all, it's not like the real world will be free of racism or that women will not be objectified as sex objects. It just won't be a matter of freely available entertainment. After all, the golden days - those "Father Knows Best" days - were the most racist and sexist, just not on TV or in the movies or on radio. And I think they should concentrate on the real instances of racism and sexism, not on how we voluntarily entertain ourselves, which may also be seen as a catharsis for the pressures of living in such a hierarchical and domineering society.
Anyway, Here is Bob Herbert's column that spurred this rant. It's just too self-righteous for my taste. It's like letting the religious right win the culture war.
( Herbert column )
xXx
Maybe I'm just too jaded and out of step with something truly good that might be in the process of happening, that is, a move to a more santized culture. We've been headed this way for some time - long gone are the heady days of the seventies, when entertainment was wild and fun, and sexploitation, for instance, ran free on movie screens. Now, there is this expression of a will to go back to the days of false decency, in which representations in entertainment are limited to our best behavior, the days of "Father Knows Best" or "Leave It To Beaver" or "The Andy Griffiths Show." Bleh.
Mind you, I'm not saying that we should not have realms of higher discourse. It's just that it is inhibiting and stultifying and hypocritical to impose full-scale political correctness on all outlets. For instance, I suppose they don't even want people to be free on satellite radio, so that not even Howard Stern can have his lesbian contests to see how much they can turn men on.
After all, it's not like the real world will be free of racism or that women will not be objectified as sex objects. It just won't be a matter of freely available entertainment. After all, the golden days - those "Father Knows Best" days - were the most racist and sexist, just not on TV or in the movies or on radio. And I think they should concentrate on the real instances of racism and sexism, not on how we voluntarily entertain ourselves, which may also be seen as a catharsis for the pressures of living in such a hierarchical and domineering society.
Anyway, Here is Bob Herbert's column that spurred this rant. It's just too self-righteous for my taste. It's like letting the religious right win the culture war.
( Herbert column )